Introduction

The EB-1A (“Extraordinary Ability”) visa offers a fast, employer-independent pathway to U.S. permanent residence (green card). Unlike many employment-based categories, EB-1A does not require labor certification (PERM) nor necessarily a job offer or employer sponsorship. That flexibility, combined with its prestige, makes it highly attractive to top talent in research, arts, business, technology, athletics, and more.

Legal Basis & History

Statutory Authority

The EB-1 category is defined under INA § 203(b)(1) as a first preference employment-based immigrant classification. Within EB-1, subsection (A) covers those with “extraordinary ability.” In other words:

Historical & Judicial Developments

One watershed moment was the Kazarian v. USCIS decision (Ninth Circuit, 2010). That case led USCIS to adopt a two-step (tiered) analysis of EB-1A petitions:

Part One (Initial Evidence): Determine whether the petitioner meets three of the ten regulatory criteria (or one-time major award).
Part Two (Final Merits Determination): Evaluate the totality and quality of the evidence to decide whether the petitioner truly merits EB-1A status, i.e. truly is “among that small percentage at the very top” of their field.

This two-tier approach means merely meeting three criteria is not sufficient; one must satisfy USCIS that the claims are credible, strong, and sufficiently distinguished. Many cases fail in the second step.

Apply Now USA Visa

What Is EB-1A (Extraordinary Ability)?

Definition & Purpose

Under USCIS regulations (8 CFR § 204.5(h)), an EB-1A beneficiary must:

Show that their achievements have been recognized by others, and
Prove that they are among the small percentage who have risen to the top of their field.

In practical terms, EB-1A is intended for individuals whose contributions have had impact beyond the ordinary — people whose careers garners recognition at high levels.

Who Uses EB-1A?

Typical applicants include:

Scientists or researchers with high-impact publications or refereed patents
Artists, musicians, filmmakers with awards, exhibitions, reviews
Entrepreneurs / business leaders who founded successful firms or show exceptional performance
Athletes or sports figures with championships or international recognition
Innovators, technologists, thought leaders

Because EB-1A allows self-petition, it’s often used by independent professionals, freelancers, startup founders, or researchers who do not have a sponsoring employer.

Advantages & Trade-offs

Advantage	Trade-off / Challenge
No need for employer sponsorship or job offer in many cases	High documentary burden & scrutiny
No PERM labor certification (no need to show U.S. workers unavailable)	Burden on applicant to present narrative, evidence
Faster visa availability / lower backlog risk	Many denials stem from weak articulation or evidence quality
Spouse and children (<21) can receive derivative status	Must plan to continue working in same field

Because of these trade-offs, having a strong strategy and legal framing is often crucial.

Core Requirements: Statute & Regulations

To qualify for an EB-1A petition, the beneficiary must satisfy not only the regulatory criteria but also several non-criteria conditions derived from statute, regulation, and USCIS policy.

Basic Requirements

Extraordinary Ability in Qualifying Fields
The applicant’s work must be in one of the enumerated fields: sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics.
Sustained National or International Acclaim
The acclaim must not be transient — it should be maintained up to the time of filing.
Recognition by Others
The accomplishments must have been recognized, not just asserted — through media, peer review, citations, awards, and so forth.
Intent to Continue Work in Field
The applicant must show that they intend to continue working in the same area of specialty in the U.S.
Substantial Benefit to U.S.
Their presence and work must be likely to substantially benefit the U.S. — this is a somewhat flexible but important requirement.

These core requirements form the foundation. However, meeting them is only the beginning. USCIS then applies a two-tier review, evaluating both the quantity and quality of evidence.

Apply Now Germany Visa

USCIS Two-Step (Tiered) Analysis & Kazarian Precedent

As introduced earlier, the Kazarian v. USCIS decision dramatically reshaped EB-1A adjudication.

Part One: Regulatory Criteria Check

Adjudicators first assess whether the applicant meets:

The one-time major award route, or
Three (or more) of the ten regulatory criteria under 8 CFR § 204.5(h)(3).

At this stage, they apply a preponderance of evidence standard: does the evidence persuade that it is more likely than not that the applicant meets those criteria?

Part Two: Final Merits Determination

If Part One is satisfied, adjudicators then evaluate the totality of evidence to determine whether the applicant truly qualifies as an individual of extraordinary ability. Key factors:

Strength & weight of each piece of evidence
Consistency, coherence, and narrative logic
Whether the applicant’s claims are credible
Whether, taken as a whole, the evidence shows they truly belong to the top echelon in their field — not just that they meet technical boxes

Even if three criteria are met, a case may be denied in Part Two if USCIS finds the evidence weak in quality.

The 10 Regulatory Criteria — In Depth

Below is a deep dive into each of the ten criteria USCIS enumerates (8 CFR § 204.5(h)(3)). For each, I explain typical forms of evidence, pitfalls, and strategic guidance.

Lesser National or International Prizes or Awards for Excellence

What it means
These are recognitions of excellence in your field — not the highest possible awards (like Nobel), but significant ones (national, regional, industry-level).

Examples & evidence

Prizes, medals, scholarships, honors from respected organizations
Awards from professional conferences or contests
Recognition from trade associations
Grant awards, fellowships (if competitive)

Strategic considerations / pitfalls

The award must be substantiated: show selection criteria, number of applicants, significance of the award
For team awards (e.g. group research prize), you must show your individual contribution was central (especially after recent USCIS guidance acknowledging team awards)
Avoid trivial or local awards with weak prestige
Avoid self-awarded or non-competitive recognitions

Membership in Associations Requiring Outstanding Achievement

What it means
You are a member of professional groups or societies that have strict admission criteria and require high achievement in that field.

Examples & evidence

Membership in selective academies, societies, or associations
Membership selection documents, eligibility criteria, member lists
Letters from the association explaining how membership is selective

Strategy & recent changes

USCIS now allows past memberships to count, not just current ones, so long as selection was achievement-based.
The association’s bylaws, eligibility criteria, and peer review standards are critical
Avoid associations with open admission or minimal entry criteria

Apply Now Indian Visa

Published Material About You in Professional or Major Media

What it means
There should be press, journalistic or trade media coverage discussing your work, contributions, or reputation.

Evidence

Articles, reviews, interviews, profiles featuring you
Newspapers, magazines, industry journals
Reprint or scanned copy, with context and translation if needed

Strategic points & pitfalls

The coverage must be independent, not self-published
Historically, USCIS looked for analysis of your work; newer guidance relaxes that requirement somewhat (just a mention may suffice)
Provide context: circulation, readership, significance
Avoid vanity press, footnotes, or citations to trivial blogs

Judging the Work of Others, Either Individually or on a Panel

What it means
You have been asked to serve as a judge, referee, or reviewer — validating or evaluating others’ work in your field.

Evidence

Invitations, letters, or appointments to panels, journal review boards
Programs listing you as adjudicator
Correspondence or emails showing your role

Strategy & pitfalls

Distinguish between occasional invited review vs regular, recognized roles
Show that the judging contexts are high-level or internationally recognized
Avoid overclaiming reviewing one-off student work

Original Contributions of Major Significance

What it means
You have made original and significant contributions to your field that have had impact — e.g., new method, invention, influential publication, or notable business achievement.

Evidence

Patents, innovations, new methodologies, algorithms
References, citations, adoption or implementation of your work
Expert letters confirming the significance
Evidence of commercial or academic uptake

Strategy & cautions

Show measurable impact — citations, adoption, downstream influence
Expert opinion letters are crucial here
Avoid vague claims; ensure that the contribution is original and not derivative

Authorship of Scholarly Articles in Professional Publications

What it means
You have written articles in peer-reviewed journals or leading trade publications in your field.

Evidence

Copies of publications, with bylines
Citation counts, impact factors, journal prestige
Evidence that your work is widely cited or used

Strategy & pitfalls

Emphasize articles with high impact, wide dissemination
Avoid low-tier, predatory journals, newsletters, or obscure local publications
Co-authored works are acceptable, but highlight your role

Display of Work at Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases

What it means
This applies primarily to artists or individuals in creative fields whose works are exhibited publicly.

Evidence

Catalogs, exhibition programs, gallery show announcements
Reviews or press coverage of your exhibitions
Evidence of selection for prestigious shows

Strategy & nuance

For non-artistic fields, this can sometimes be adapted (e.g. demos, showcases, public presentations) as “comparable evidence.
Show the prestige of the exhibitions

Leading or Critical Role in Distinguished Organizations

What it means
You have had a leading or pivotal position in organizations noted for their excellence.

Evidence

Organizational charts, job description, letters confirming your role
Media mentions or internal documentation showing your leadership
Letters describing your contributions and responsibilities

Strategy & cautions

The organization should itself be distinguished (recognized, large, prominent)
Show you had authority, decision-making, or crucial functions
Avoid overstating marginal roles

High Salary or Remuneration

What it means
Your compensation is significantly higher than peers in your field, indicating that the market values your work heavily.

Evidence

Pay stubs, contracts, W-2s, financial statements
Comparisons with industry norms, surveys
Bonuses, stock, awards

Strategy & caution

Provide third-party salary surveys or expert attestations
High salary alone is rarely enough; it serves as corroborative evidence
Avoid inflated claims without supporting data

Apply Now USA Visa

Commercial Success in the Performing Arts

What it means
This applies to performing artists whose works have commercial success (e.g. box office receipts, recorded sales).

Evidence

Sales data, box office figures, chart rankings
Award lists, ticket sales, contracts
Reviews or press coverage confirming success

Strategy & context

Limited to arts/performing fields
Use verifiable, recognized metrics
Avoid speculative projections

Alternatives & “Comparable Evidence”

Sometimes an applicant cannot fully satisfy a criterion exactly as written. USCIS allows “comparable evidence” — alternative forms of proof when the regulatory criterion does not exactly fit the field.

For example:

A technologist might substitute conference keynote invitations or participation in influential technology standards committees as analogous to exhibitions.
A business innovator might use market share reports, revenue growth, strategic partnerships as evidence of significance.
In some fields, citation indices, download metrics, or software usage stats may substitute for traditional publication metrics.

However, you must clearly explain why the substitute evidence is comparable and make a persuasive mapping to the regulatory intent. USCIS may reject evidence that is novel but poorly explained.

Key Additional Requirements (Beyond Criteria)

Meeting three criteria is necessary, but not sufficient. Here are the other critical elements USCIS requires, often sources of Request for Evidence (RFE) or denial.

Intent to Continue Working in the Area of Expertise

Your petition must show you plan to continue doing work in your field of extraordinary ability. This could be employment, research, consulting, or other activities consistent with your career.

Strategies:

Describe intended activities in the U.S. (e.g. research projects, startup, collaborations)
Use letters from U.S. organizations or prospective collaborators
Avoid shifting completely into non-relevant roles (e.g. from research to purely administrative)
USCIS may closely scrutinize late-career transitions (e.g. athlete to coach) to ensure continuity of expertise.

Entry Must Substantially Benefit the U.S.

Though not well-defined in statute, USCIS expects that the work you will perform in the U.S. must contribute significantly (economically, culturally, scientifically, etc.).

Examples of U.S. benefit arguments:

Bringing advanced skills or knowledge not readily available in the U.S.
Driving innovation, research, job creation
Attracting investment, generating intellectual property
Serving underserved communities or roles of national interest

Pitfalls:

Avoid vague or generic statements (e.g. “I will contribute”); tie to measurable outcomes
Strong expert letters and endorsements help ground the benefit arguments

Self-Petition & No Employer Sponsorship Required

One of EB-1A’s key advantages is that applicants can self-petition (you can file Form I-140 on your own).

However, if you do have an employer or collaborator, including their support (letters, commitment) strengthens the case.

Sustained Acclaim and Maintenance of Status

Recognition must not be historical only; it must be sustained (ongoing) until the time of filing. USCIS considers whether acclaim continues, whether your work remains relevant.

For example, if someone peaked many years ago but has little recent impact, USCIS may question whether the acclaim is still valid.

Further, USCIS does not impose a rigid time limit (you can be young or mid-career).

Sustained Acclaim and Maintenance of Status

Recent USCIS Policy Updates & Clarifications

USCIS periodically issues clarifying guidance to help standardize EB-1A adjudications. Some recent updates to note:

Team Awards Counting: USCIS now may count team awards under the “prizes/awards” criterion if you show your role in the team was critical.
Past Memberships Permitted: Membership in a qualifying association can be considered even if not current, so long as admission was based on merits.
Published Material Relaxation: In some cases, mere mention or feature may suffice instead of deep analytical coverage, depending on context.
Clarified Evidence Types: USCIS revised its policy manual to clarify that, in STEM especially, evidentiary flexibility is allowed (e.g. conference presentations, software tools) under “comparable evidence.
Policy Manual Changes: USCIS updated Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2 to reflect these clarifications and provide examples.

Understanding these evolving guidelines is crucial — applying older templates without accounting for updated flexibilities or stricter thresholds may weaken a case.

Strategic Considerations & Pitfalls

Writing an EB-1A petition is more than assembling evidence. It’s about narrative, coherence, and anticipating adjudicator skepticism. Below are strategic points and common pitfalls:

Narrative & Coherence

Tell a story: The petition should weave a consistent narrative — how your contributions progressed, your field’s challenges, and your role pushing boundaries.
Link evidence to narrative: Don’t just list publications; explain why they matter.
Use expert letters wisely: Letters from recognized authorities in your field can contextualize your contributions and impress adjudicators.
Address weaknesses proactively: For criteria that are borderline, include discussion or explanation to defend them.
Avoid redundancy: Redundant or weak evidence dilutes stronger items. Use only what supports the narrative.

Pitfalls & Red Flags

Overreliance on quantity over quality: Hundreds of minor publications or awards in weak venues do not substitute for fewer high-impact ones.
Predatory or low-quality journals: Using obscure or pay-to-publish journals undermines credibility.
Weak expert letters (inflated praise, vague terms): Generic letters lacking specifics are often disregarded.
Unsupported claims or exaggeration: If you claim leadership, show documents demonstrating it.
Switching fields: If your acclaim is in one domain but your intended field is different, USCIS may question continuity.
Weak “benefit to U.S.” argument: If you fail to convincingly explain how your presence helps the U.S., you may be denied.
Missing or inconsistent documentation: Gaps, broken links, or missing indices for exhibits can frustrate adjudicators.

Field-Specific Nuances

STEM / engineering / software: Emphasize adoption, citations, downloads, patents, collaborations.
Business / entrepreneurship: Highlight strategic partnerships, revenues, growth, investments.
Arts / creative fields: Use media coverage, exhibitions, reviews, sales metrics.
Sports / athletics: Emphasize championships, records, recognition, endorsements.

Timing & Sequencing

Begin collecting evidence early — many required items arise over time (presentations, citations).
File when you have enough strong evidence to pass final merits, not minimal criteria.
Monitor your field — emerging contributions after filing may not help your case.
Use premium processing (as applicable) when confident in the petition.

Evidence Collection & Documentation Best Practices

A robust evidence portfolio can make or break your EB-1A filing. Below are recommended practices:

Organizational Practices

Exhibit Index & Table of Contents: A clear, logical index helps reviewers navigate your petition.
Tabbing, numbering, bookmarks: Especially for lengthy petitions, make it easy to reference.
Cross-references: Link narrative claims to exhibit numbers.
Translations & certifications: Submit English translations and certified copies for non-English documents.

Evidence Quality

Prefer primary sources (original publications, contracts) over summaries
Where appropriate, include contextual documents (e.g. field norms, salary surveys)
Ensure all evidence shows dates, authors, venues — anonymities weaken impact
Use expert letters to contextualize your contributions (impact, field norms)

Expert / Peer Letters

Choose letter writers of recognized stature (peers, leaders in your field)
The letters should explain the significance of your contribution, compare you to peers, and contextualize how your work stands out
Avoid self-serving or overly promotional language
Letters should ideally come from a mix of domestic and international experts

Documentation for Non-Standard Evidence

When using “comparable evidence,” include a rationale memo explaining equivalence
Provide background info (e.g. download stats, impact metrics) to substantiate newer evidence forms
Be conservative — rely primarily on classic evidence where possible

By combining strong narrative, expert letters, and well-organized exhibits, you maximize your chance to get through both tiers of USCIS review.

Procedural Steps & Timeline

Below is a typical sequence and estimated timeline for an EB-1A petition. Timelines vary widely depending on complexity, country of origin, and USCIS center workloads.

Step-by-Step Process

Eligibility Assessment / Planning
Consult immigration counsel, map required evidence, identify gaps.
Time: weeks to months
Evidence Collection & Assembly
Obtain letters, collect publications, assemble proof, draft narrative.
Time: months (depending on how much you already have)
Prepare & File Form I-140 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker)
- Pay applicable filing fees
- Include cover memo, index, exhibits, supporting narrative
USCIS Review / RFE
USCIS may issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) asking for additional documentation or clarifications.
Time: 30–90 days to respond; add USCIS adjudication time
Form I-140 Approval / Denial
If approved, you hold EB-1A priority. If denied, you may appeal (AAO or motion to reopen).
Green Card Issuance / Entry to U.S.
Upon final grant, you and dependents immigrate, receive permanent resident status.

Timing Considerations

Premium processing accelerates I-140 adjudication (≈15 days)
Visa bulletin cutoff dates influence when you can file I-485 or consular processing
Delays often arise from RFEs, missing evidence, or complex questions
Cases with strong documentation can go from start to green card in ~12–18 months
But many cases take 2+ years, especially from countries with high demand

Locke Immigration’s blog offers a useful timeline breakdown.

Adjustment of Status vs Consular Processing

Once your I-140 is approved and a visa number is available, you can obtain your green card via two main routes.

Adjustment of Status (AOS) — If You Are in the U.S.

File Form I-485 to change status to lawful permanent resident.
Requirements: lawful entry (inspected & admitted/paroled), presence, eligibility, and visa availability.
Benefits: no consulate interviews abroad; you may get work authorization (EAD) or travel (Advance Parole) while pending
Risks: if your status changes or travel outside U.S., complications may arise

Consular Processing — If You Are Abroad

Once I-140 is approved and visa is available, your case is forwarded to National Visa Center (NVC).
You complete immigrant visa paperwork, attend consular interview at U.S. embassy.
Upon visa issuance, you travel to U.S. and become permanent resident on arrival.
Processing times vary by consulate and country workload

Which route is better depends on your location, immigration status, risk appetite, and convenience.

Common RFE Issues & How to Preempt Them

Because USCIS scrutinizes EB-1A petitions intensely, RFEs are common. Below are typical issues and how to preempt or respond.

Weak Explanation or Narrative

Issue: Evidence is present, but narrative fails to connect it to “extraordinary ability” or benefit to U.S.
Preempt: Include a strong legal brief / foundation letter tying each piece of evidence to regulatory criteria and narrative

Insufficient or Vague Expert Letters

Issue: Letters are generic, lack detail, or are from obscure sources
Preempt: Use well-known experts in your field, request specifics (impact, comparative statements, concrete examples)

Overemphasis on Quantity, Not Quality

Issue: Many low-tier publications or awards, but few high-impact ones
Preempt: Prioritize evidence with high credibility, drop weak items

“No Job Offer” Concerns

Issue: USCIS doubts whether you will actually continue work in your field
Preempt: Provide business plans, commitments, letters from collaborators or institutions

Weak U.S. Benefit Argument

Issue: USCIS asks for more justification of beneficial impact to U.S.
Preempt: Use data, projected outcomes, letter endorsements, prior impact examples

Evidence Gaps or Missing Documents

Issue: Missing verification, gaps in timeline, untranslated docs
Preempt: Meticulously audit your exhibits list and ensure all claims are substantiated

Inconsistent or Contradictory Claims

Issue: The narrative claims differ from the evidence
Preempt: Consistency across narrative, letters, exhibits; cross-check duplicates

When you receive an RFE, respond comprehensively — not just with more documents but with sharpened narrative and clarifications.

Read More : Iraq Visa for Indians

Case Studies & Illustrative Examples

Here are a few hypothetical (but plausible) illustrations to show how EB-1A cases could be structured.

Example A: STEM Researcher / Software Innovator

Profile Highlights:

Major conference keynote invitations
Highly cited publications
A patented algorithm used by industry
Expert letters from recognized authorities
Moderate salary above peers
National-level awards in computer science

Approach:

Use “original contributions” criterion for the patent and its adoption
Use “authorship” for high-impact papers
Use “judging” for peer review roles
Use “salary” as corroborative evidence
Use benefit-to-U.S. argument: adoption by U.S. firms, collaborations, tech transfer

This hypothetical researcher could robustly meet multiple criteria and survive the final merits assessment.

Example B: Visual Artist / Designer

Profile Highlights:

Exhibitions in national galleries
Press coverage in art magazines
Curatorial roles judging exhibitions
Art sales / commission records
Membership in selective art associations

Approach:

Use “exhibitions” criterion
Use “published material” (reviews / features)
Use “judging” (jurying art shows)
Use “commercial success” (sale records)
Use “membership” in artist societies

The narrative should tie artistic influence, commissions, and recognition to the U.S. benefit (e.g. contributions to U.S. cultural scene).

Example C: Business / Entrepreneur

Profile Highlights:

Founded a startup with international clients
Revenue growth, strategic partnerships
Awards for innovation or business performance
Media coverage in business journals
Advisory roles or judging startup competitions

Approach:

Use “original contribution” (innovative business model, market disruption)
Use “published material” (features/interviews)
Use “judging” (venture capital panels)
Use “membership” (entrepreneur associations)
Use “salary / remuneration” if applicable

The U.S. benefit argument may emphasize job creation, economic impact, or technology transfer.

These case studies show how different fields require tailored strategies, not a one-size-fits-all approach.

When EB-1A Might Be Unwise or Unachievable

While EB-1A is alluring, not everyone is suited for it. Some scenarios where it may not be wise:

You lack at least three strong, independent criteria.
Your evidence is almost entirely in minor venues or self-published work.
There is a mismatch between your past acclaim and your current or planned field.
The benefit-to-U.S. argument is weak or speculative.
You cannot get credible expert letters.
You prefer a less strenuous route (e.g. EB-2 + National Interest Waiver) with a more modest standard.

In such cases, pursuing EB-2 (with or without NIW), or waiting to strengthen your profile, can be strategic.

Comparative View: EB-1B, EB-1C, EB-2 / NIW

It helps to understand how EB-1A fits among related visa paths.

EB-1B (Outstanding Professors & Researchers)

Requires employer sponsorship (a U.S. institution)
Must have at least 3 years of teaching/research experience
Must satisfy 2 of 6 criteria (less stringent than EB-1A)
Best suited for academics rather than independent talent

EB-1C (Multinational Executives / Managers)

For executives/managers being transferred from a foreign affiliate to the U.S.
Requires employer, corporate relationship, and managerial capacity
Not applicable to independent or individual freelancers

Conclusion

The EB-1A visa is a powerful route to U.S. permanent residency for individuals who truly stand at the top of their field. But that power comes with great burden of proof and stringent review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the EB-1A visa?

The EB-1A visa, also called the Extraordinary Ability Green Card, is a U.S. immigrant visa for individuals who have demonstrated exceptional talent in fields such as science, business, arts, education, or athletics. It allows self-petition and leads directly to permanent residency.

Who qualifies for the EB-1A visa?

You qualify if you can prove that you are among the small percentage at the very top of your field, either by receiving a major international award (like a Nobel Prize or Olympic medal) or by meeting at least 3 out of 10 USCIS criteria (awards, publications, judging, high salary, etc.).

Do I need a U.S. job offer to apply for EB-1A?

No. The EB-1A is one of the few employment-based visas that does not require employer sponsorship. You can self-petition and do not need a permanent job offer in the U.S.

What distinguishes EB-1A from EB-2 NIW?

EB-1A: Requires extraordinary ability and national/international recognition. Faster approval, but higher standards.
EB-2 NIW: Focuses on work that benefits the U.S. national interest. Easier eligibility but slower processing.

How long does the EB-1A process take?

I-140 petition: 4–9 months (or 15 days with premium processing).
Adjustment of Status (I-485): 8–14 months depending on USCIS workload.
Total: Between 1–2 years in most cases, unless affected by visa backlogs.

Can I apply for EB-1A from outside the U.S.?

Yes. If you are abroad, you can go through consular processing at a U.S. embassy or consulate after your I-140 is approved.

What are the 10 USCIS EB-1A criteria?

The criteria include: awards, memberships, media coverage, judging others’ work, original contributions, scholarly articles, artistic exhibitions, critical roles, high salary, and commercial success in performing arts. You must meet at least 3 out of 10.

How many criteria should I aim to meet?

While USCIS requires only 3, most successful applicants demonstrate 4–6 criteria to strengthen their case and improve approval chances.

How much does the EB-1A cost?

I-140 filing fee: $715
Premium processing fee: $2,805 (optional)
I-485 adjustment fee: $1,225
Attorney fees: Typically $6,000–$15,000
Total cost ranges between $8,000–$20,000 depending on your approach.

What is the EB-1A approval rate?

Approval rates vary, but EB-1A has historically maintained a 70–75% success rate. Success depends heavily on the strength of evidence and petition preparation.

Do recommendation letters matter for EB-1A?

Yes, letters of recommendation are critical. They should come from independent experts (not just close colleagues) and highlight your impact and recognition in the field. However, letters alone are not enough — they must be backed by solid evidence.

Can startup founders qualify for EB-1A?

Yes. Entrepreneurs can qualify by proving funding, press recognition, patents, innovation, or market impact. Startup founders often use media coverage and evidence of disruption to meet EB-1A criteria.

What happens if my EB-1A petition is denied?

If denied, you can:

File a Motion to Reopen or Reconsider (MTR)
Appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO)
Refile a stronger petition with additional evidence
You may also consider EB-2 NIW as an alternative pathway.

Can EB-1A lead to U.S. citizenship?

Yes. EB-1A grants permanent residency (green card). After 5 years as a green card holder, you can apply for U.S. citizenship through naturalization.

Is EB-1A better than the O-1 visa?

The O-1 is temporary (non-immigrant) and requires employer sponsorship, while the EB-1A provides a direct path to a green card with self-sponsorship. Many applicants use the O-1 first, then transition to EB-1A once their profile strengthens.

USA Visa Apply Now